A few years ago I wrote an article as a freelance writer, to the National Geographic magazine opposing their blatant belief in Evolution. Now while I agree that things evolve within a relatively small scope, never changing into something else, but merely trying to become a better self, I totally disagree with the Theory of Evolution. It has scientific errors, as well as "belief" differences. The Theory of Evolution needs something to start with, whether it's gases, dust, or a combination of the two. So if this theory is to explain the origins of the universe, how is that possible if there were no gases or dust particles to work from? Answer. It isn't possible.
One scientist referred to the impossibility of evolution by referring to the three laws of energy. He said, "The possibility of evolution occurring were similar to a tornado going through a junk yard and assembling a 747." Evolutionists will look at that statement and say, "Yes, but there is still a possibility. The problem is they haven't thought through their science. So for your edification, here are the 3 laws of Thermodynamics, or Energy:
1) You cannot win (that is, you cannot get something for nothing, because matter and energy are conserved.
2) You cannot break even (you cannot return to the same energy state, because there is always an increase in disorder; entropy always increases)
3) You cannot get out of the game (because absolute zero is unattainable)
(author C.P. Snow)
Let's take another look at that as it may or may not apply to Evolution;
The First Law of Thermodynamics tells us that you have to start with something. Evolutionists have claimed gas clouds, space dust, etc. yet they would need to have an origin. So, simply speaking, if Evolution is correct it does not explain the origin of things, only what happened after. And many of their theories about even that are fairy tales.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that everything is moving away from the point of origin in an ever increasing disorder. Remember the man who talked about a tornado assembling a 747? He started with 2 things, a junk yard and a tornado, which resulted in an airplane. Notice he emphasizes that you can't get something from nothing. Following his reason, that same energy, the tornado, will rip apart the 747. That's not evolution but destruction. Just ask anyone who lives in Tornado Alley.
The Third Law of Thermodynamics says, "you cannot get out of the game." In order to stop entropy, that is the increasing disorder, you would have to bring everything down to absolute zero in temperature. So everything is destined to fall apart, not change into something new to exist. The very act of changing would cause some kinetic (heat) energy keeping you from reaching absolute zero since it is creating heat.
Now let's look at things from a Biblical perspective:
While energy cannot be created or destroy, when God spoke, in Genesis chapter 1, His Word, part of Him, was able to be the kind of energy that could create. The scientific definition of energy is E=M times C(squared). That's Energy equals Matter times the Speed of Light squared. Interesting thing about mathematic formulas. You can solve any part of the equation, by a little shifting, which requires some more math. So we get M=E divided by C(squared) or Matter equals Energy times The Speed of Light squared. We didn't create something out of nothing, but took the energy available, the spoken Word of God, and compromised it by slowing it down or changing its composition to create a different kind of Energy...Matter. God would have held that creation energy together forever if it hadn't been for one thing. The sin of man. So it was now out of His hands, moving irrationally or disorderly towards its own destruction. The one glimmer of hope we have is that when God became a man and died on the cross for our sin we can have the glorious future of one day being brought back into His hand, living eternally without sin. It won't happen on this earth, but we are called to let God work through us and let Him remake us into the image of His Son.
A lot of people have argued this with me. I really don't mean to argue. I am just tired of seeing people accept things because some magazine or TV show or movie tells us we should believe. I want you to challenge what you have been taught and see if God's Word doesn't come out on top every time. That may mean slight disagreements with your particular religion, but that's okay. God hasn't called us to be church members, but part of His family.
The first law, also known as Law of Conservation of Energy, states that energy cannot be created or destroyed in a chemical reaction.
Source: Boundless. “The Three Laws of Thermodynamics.” Boundless Chemistry. Boundless, 27 Jun. 2015. Retrieved 01 Jul. 2015 from https://www.boundless.com/chemistry/textbooks/boundless-chemistry-textbook/thermodynamics-17/the-laws-of-thermodynamics-123/the-three-laws-of-thermodynamics-496-3601/
Source: Boundless. “The Three Laws of Thermodynamics.” Boundless Chemistry. Boundless, 27 Jun. 2015. Retrieved 01 Jul. 2015 from https://www.boundless.com/chemistry/textbooks/boundless-chemistry-textbook/thermodynamics-17/the-laws-of-thermodynamics-123/the-three-laws-of-thermodynamics-496-3601/
The first law, also known as Law of Conservation of Energy, states that energy cannot be created or destroyed in a chemical reaction.
Source: Boundless. “The Three Laws of Thermodynamics.” Boundless Chemistry. Boundless, 27 Jun. 2015. Retrieved 01 Jul. 2015 from https://www.boundless.com/chemistry/textbooks/boundless-chemistry-textbook/thermodynamics-17/the-laws-of-thermodynamics-123/the-three-laws-of-thermodynamics-496-3601/
Source: Boundless. “The Three Laws of Thermodynamics.” Boundless Chemistry. Boundless, 27 Jun. 2015. Retrieved 01 Jul. 2015 from https://www.boundless.com/chemistry/textbooks/boundless-chemistry-textbook/thermodynamics-17/the-laws-of-thermodynamics-123/the-three-laws-of-thermodynamics-496-3601/
No comments:
Post a Comment